“There’s definitely a sense that the previous DHB system was on its last legs,” says Tenbensel, an associate professor of health systems in the School of Population Health. “Unlike health reforms in previous decades, these have in principle quite a bit of support from the health sector.”
However, the details of implementation are what will determine the reforms’ success – or lack thereof, the experts say.
“Overall, I like the direction the reform is taking,” says King, who is John and Marylyn Mayo Chair in Health Law. “However, anytime you’re trying to drive massive change in a large and existing system, there are people who wholeheartedly take on that change and then there are people who are much more resistant.”
The case for health reform
The current health reform isn’t the first Tenbensel has seen in his 25 years of teaching and researching health policy. At the turn of the millennium, Helen Clark’s Labour government went the opposite direction – it decentralised the health system to provide more local input and control over services. This was a response to the 1990s abolition of local boards under a National government.
In practice, the DHB system grew fragmented and complicated. The biggest problem, however, was and is inequity.
Compared to other high-income countries, New Zealand’s healthcare system is overall in the middle, sixth out of 11 in a recent Commonwealth Fund analysis. It does well in spending efficiency and in areas such as coordinated care and safe care. However, Māori life expectancy at birth is seven years shorter than non- Māori. New Zealand ranks third-last in equity.